lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+9ihz8La+JrIa/L@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:18:31 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description on returned
 value in some functions

Hi Andy,

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:01:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:27:53PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:57:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > >   * fwnode_get_next_child_node - Return the next child node handle for a node
> > >   * @fwnode: Firmware node to find the next child node for.
> > >   * @child: Handle to one of the node's child nodes or a %NULL handle.
> > > + *
> > > + * Caller is responsible to call fwnode_handle_put() on the returned fwnode
> > > + * pointer.
> > 
> > The loop itself will also put the child node, so this is only relevant
> > outside the loop.
> 
> Yes and this is exactly what people stumbled over. Hence this note.
> This call per se doesn't loop, so I didn't get how your comment can
> be transformed to anything here. Care to elaborate a bit more on
> what I have to add here or reword?

Ah, indeed. This is achieved by putting the previous child. Generally this
function is used via the loop helper macro and not called directly, hence
the documentation there matters the most. Those functions appear to be
without any documentation though.

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ