linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description of returned value in some functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:47:41 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description of returned
 value in some functions

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Some of the functions do not provide Return: section on absence of which
> kernel-doc complains. Besides that several functions return the fwnode
> handle with incremented reference count. Add a respective note to make sure
> that the caller decrements it when it's not needed anymore.
> 
> While at it, unify the style of the Return: sections.
> 
> Reported-by: Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: rephrased the note, added tag, removed unrelated change
>     (all requested by Sakari)

I just realized I have forgotten to bump the version.
I will wait for other comments, and will issue a v3 if needed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko