[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y++FfYfiE1mLceNk@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:47:41 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description of returned
value in some functions
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Some of the functions do not provide Return: section on absence of which
> kernel-doc complains. Besides that several functions return the fwnode
> handle with incremented reference count. Add a respective note to make sure
> that the caller decrements it when it's not needed anymore.
>
> While at it, unify the style of the Return: sections.
>
> Reported-by: Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2: rephrased the note, added tag, removed unrelated change
> (all requested by Sakari)
I just realized I have forgotten to bump the version.
I will wait for other comments, and will issue a v3 if needed.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists