[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230217164227.mw2cyp22bsnvuh6t@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:42:27 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Rakesh Sankaranarayanan <rakesh.sankaranarayanan@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
woojung.huh@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: dsa: microchip: add eth mac
grouping for ethtool statistics
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:01:15PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > + ++mib->cnt_ptr;
>
> Reason for the pre-increment? :)
because it's kool
Somebody not that long ago suggested that pre-increment is "less resource consuming":
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/677a5e37aab97a4f992d35c41329733c5f3082fb.1675407169.git.daniel@makrotopia.org/#25197216
Of course, when pressed to explain more, he stopped responding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists