linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a8358cd-4c2e-ed70-2cc5-1cff27b7594d@collabora.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Feb 2023 02:32:06 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com
Cc:     aou@...s.berkeley.edu, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        heiko@...ech.de, kai.heng.feng@...onical.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        paulmck@...nel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        pmladek@...e.com, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        tangmeng@...ontech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any
 priority

On 2/19/23 02:20, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 2/14/23 18:17, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
...
>> Sorry for being slow here, I'd been assuming someone would Ack this but
>> it looks like maybe there's nobody in the maintainers file for
>> kernel/reboot.c?  I'm fine taking this via the RISC-V tree if that's OK
>> with people, but the cover letter suggests the patch is necessary for
>> multiple patch sets.
> 
> See also Dmitry's reply[0] to the PSCI thread. (Maybe I should have sent
> both conversions as one series?)
> 
> I am happy with the patches going through any tree. The kernel/reboot.c
> patch is exactly the same between the two series, so it should not hurt
> if it gets merged twice. Though if you take this series through the
> RISC-V tree, maybe you want to create a tag for it?
> 
> I am not sure exactly what needs to be done here; I am happy to do
> anything that would assist getting both series merged for v6.3, to avoid
> a regression with axp20x[1].
> 
> Regards,
> Samuel
> 
> [0]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0a180849-ba1b-2a82-ab06-ed1b8155d5ca@collabora.com/
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e38d29f5-cd3c-4a2b-b355-2bcfad00a24b@sholland.org/

The reboot.c changes should be acked/applied by Rafael.
I noticed that you haven't CC'd the linux-pm ML, maybe that's why it
hasn't got the attention.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry