linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-480cc68b-261d-4ef2-a67a-205a154c3895@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org
CC:     samuel@...lland.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        heiko@...ech.de, kai.heng.feng@...onical.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        paulmck@...nel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        pmladek@...e.com, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        tangmeng@...ontech.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority

On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:32:06 PST (-0800), dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com wrote:
> On 2/19/23 02:20, Samuel Holland wrote:
>> On 2/14/23 18:17, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> ...
>>> Sorry for being slow here, I'd been assuming someone would Ack this but
>>> it looks like maybe there's nobody in the maintainers file for
>>> kernel/reboot.c?  I'm fine taking this via the RISC-V tree if that's OK
>>> with people, but the cover letter suggests the patch is necessary for
>>> multiple patch sets.
>>
>> See also Dmitry's reply[0] to the PSCI thread. (Maybe I should have sent
>> both conversions as one series?)
>>
>> I am happy with the patches going through any tree. The kernel/reboot.c
>> patch is exactly the same between the two series, so it should not hurt
>> if it gets merged twice. Though if you take this series through the
>> RISC-V tree, maybe you want to create a tag for it?
>>
>> I am not sure exactly what needs to be done here; I am happy to do
>> anything that would assist getting both series merged for v6.3, to avoid
>> a regression with axp20x[1].
>>
>> Regards,
>> Samuel
>>
>> [0]:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0a180849-ba1b-2a82-ab06-ed1b8155d5ca@collabora.com/
>> [1]:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e38d29f5-cd3c-4a2b-b355-2bcfad00a24b@sholland.org/
>
> The reboot.c changes should be acked/applied by Rafael.
> I noticed that you haven't CC'd the linux-pm ML, maybe that's why it
> hasn't got the attention.

OK, I'm adding them here.  Not sure if we're ment to re-send it to the 
list, no rush on my end I'm just scrubbing through some old stuff on 
patchwork again.