[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2094ecec-f63c-4e8a-ba97-da77c5266da1@t-8ch.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:34:26 +0000
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Storm Dragon <stormdragon2976@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vc_screen: don't clobber return value in vcs_read
+Cc people who were involved in the original thread.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:48:59PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 20. 02. 23, 7:46, linux@...ssschuh.net wrote:
> > From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> >
> > Commit 226fae124b2d
> > ("vc_screen: move load of struct vc_data pointer in vcs_read() to avoid UAF")
> > moved the call to vcs_vc() into the loop.
> > While doing this it also moved the unconditional assignment of
> > "ret = -ENXIO".
> > This unconditional assignment was valid outside the loop but within it
> > it clobbers the actual value of ret.
> >
> > To avoid this only assign "ret = -ENXIO" when actually needed.
>
> Not sure -- I cannot find it -- but hasn't George fixed this yet?
Indeed there was a proposed fix at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1675704844-17228-1-git-send-email-george.kennedy@oracle.com/
Linus had some suggestions so it was not applied as is.
I'm not sure what the current state is.
George, do you have something in the pipeline?
I also tested the patch proposed by Linus as attachment and that works.
(The small inline patch snippet doesn't)
> > Reported-by: Storm Dragon <stormdragon2976@...il.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y%2FKS6vdql2pIsCiI@hotmail.com/
> > Fixes: 226fae124b2d ("vc_screen: move load of struct vc_data pointer in vcs_read() to avoid UAF")
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > @Storm Could you validate this patch?
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
> > index f566eb1839dc..2ef519a40a87 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
> > @@ -403,10 +403,11 @@ vcs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > unsigned int this_round, skip = 0;
> > int size;
> > - ret = -ENXIO;
> > vc = vcs_vc(inode, &viewed);
> > - if (!vc)
> > + if (!vc) {
> > + ret = -ENXIO;
> > goto unlock_out;
> > + }
> > /* Check whether we are above size each round,
> > * as copy_to_user at the end of this loop
> >
> > base-commit: c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c
>
> --
> js
> suse labs
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists