[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230220190908.gfd2c4tuzeb7cft6@treble>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 11:09:08 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pjt@...gle.com, evn@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, kim.phillips@....com,
alexandre.chartre@...cle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
José Oliveira <joseloliveira11@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Branco <rodrigo@...nelhacking.com>,
Alexandra Sandulescu <aesa@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Allow STIBP with IBRS
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 07:34:59PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Drop stable@ again.
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:27:17AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > IBRS is only enabled in kernel space. Since it's not enabled in user
> > space, user space isn't protected from indirect branch prediction
> > attacks from a sibling CPU thread.
> >
> > Allow STIBP to be enabled to protect against such attacks.
> >
> > Fixes: 7c693f54c873 ("x86/speculation: Add spectre_v2=ibrs option to support Kernel IBRS")
>
> Yah, look at that one:
>
> commit 7c693f54c873691a4b7da05c7e0f74e67745d144
> Author: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Tue Jun 14 23:15:55 2022 +0200
>
> x86/speculation: Add spectre_v2=ibrs option to support Kernel IBRS
>
> Extend spectre_v2= boot option with Kernel IBRS.
>
> [jpoimboe: no STIBP with IBRS]
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I'm assuming this was supposed to mean no STIBP in *kernel mode* when
> IBRS is selected?
No it was supposed to be "no STIBP with *eIBRS*".
> In user mode, STIBP should be selectable as we disable IBRS there.
>
> Close?
>
> If so, pls document it too while at it:
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst
>
> because we will be wondering next time again.
>
> Like we wonder each time this madness is being touched. ;-(
As far as I can tell, that document was never updated to describe
spectre_v2=ibrs in the first place. That would be a whole 'nother patch
which I'm not volunteering for. Nice try ;-)
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists