[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88a3fa09-60cb-bb3c-c392-286efd983627@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:13:45 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, steven.price@....com,
alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
robh@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add a compatible
for MediaTek MT8186
Il 22/02/23 09:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>> index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties:
>>
>> compatible:
>> oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - mediatek,mt8186-mali
>> + - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali
>> + - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
>
> The MT8186 has Mali-G52 MC2 2EE, while the MT8183 has Mali-G72 MP3.
Keeping in mind the obvious - which is that G52 and G72 are both Bifrost....
> So we actually need a new entry with two power domains.
>
...This is my node for MT8186:
gpu: gpu@...40000 {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mali",
"mediatek,mt8183b-mali",
"arm,mali-bifrost";
reg = <0 0x13040000 0 0x4000>;
clocks = <&mfgsys CLK_MFG_BG3D>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 276 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
<GIC_SPI 275 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
<GIC_SPI 274 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu";
power-domains = <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG1>,
<&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG2>,
<&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG3>;
power-domain-names = "core0", "core1", "core2";
/* Please ignore speedbin, that's for another time :-) */
nvmem-cells = <&gpu_volt_bin>;
nvmem-cell-names = "speed-bin";
#cooling-cells = <2>;
};
There are three MFG power domains... MFG2 and MFG3 are parents of MFG1, on that
I agree, but we can avoid adding a new entry just for MT8186 and use the MT8183-b
one while still being technically correct.
Besides, Mali G52 and Mali G72 are both Bifrost... so I don't think that this
commit is incorrect. For the sake of simplicity, I would push on getting this
one picked.
Unless there are any real-strong opinions against...
Regards,
Angelo
> Our downstream Mali driver & DT use just that.
>
> ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists