[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5H3XMF7ov_WfNFA=HC0frD003MRdVuBOFiBvu8zxE_rwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:43:50 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, steven.price@....com,
alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
robh@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add a compatible
for MediaTek MT8186
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:13 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 22/02/23 09:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> >> index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties:
> >>
> >> compatible:
> >> oneOf:
> >> + - items:
> >> + - enum:
> >> + - mediatek,mt8186-mali
> >> + - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali
> >> + - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
> >
> > The MT8186 has Mali-G52 MC2 2EE, while the MT8183 has Mali-G72 MP3.
>
> Keeping in mind the obvious - which is that G52 and G72 are both Bifrost....
>
> > So we actually need a new entry with two power domains.
> >
>
> ...This is my node for MT8186:
>
> gpu: gpu@...40000 {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mali",
> "mediatek,mt8183b-mali",
> "arm,mali-bifrost";
> reg = <0 0x13040000 0 0x4000>;
>
> clocks = <&mfgsys CLK_MFG_BG3D>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 276 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> <GIC_SPI 275 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> <GIC_SPI 274 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu";
> power-domains = <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG1>,
> <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG2>,
> <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG3>;
> power-domain-names = "core0", "core1", "core2";
>
> /* Please ignore speedbin, that's for another time :-) */
> nvmem-cells = <&gpu_volt_bin>;
> nvmem-cell-names = "speed-bin";
> #cooling-cells = <2>;
> };
>
> There are three MFG power domains... MFG2 and MFG3 are parents of MFG1, on that
> I agree, but we can avoid adding a new entry just for MT8186 and use the MT8183-b
> one while still being technically correct.
>
> Besides, Mali G52 and Mali G72 are both Bifrost... so I don't think that this
> commit is incorrect. For the sake of simplicity, I would push on getting this
> one picked.
I'm aware. In case it wasn't obvious, Mali-G52 MC2 2EE has 2 cores, while
Mali-G72 MP3 has 3 cores. I think that is reason enough to do a new entry.
Otherwise you are describing power domains for 3 cores for a GPU that only
has two.
> Unless there are any real-strong opinions against...
Yes.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists