linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Allow CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5=y + CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/X7xd8NKQe7KhPG@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:25:57 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     maennich@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Allow CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5=y +
 CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:37AM +0000, maennich@...gle.com wrote:
> From: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>
> 
> Can we please pick this series up for 5.15? I am particularly interested
> in the last patch to enable BTF + DWARF5, but the cleanup patches before
> are a very reasonable choice for stable@ as well as they simplify the
> pahole version calculation and allow future BTF/pahole related patches
> to apply cleanly as well. I intentionally kept the config
> PAHOLE_HAS_BTF_TAG and hence its patch complete, even though there is no
> user for it.

What are the upstream git commit ids for these changes?

thanks,

greg k-h