linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:26:32 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     maennich@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF
 section

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@...gle.com wrote:
> From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> 
> Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to
> the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and
> picked up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F:	net/sched/act_bpf.c
>  F:	net/sched/cls_bpf.c
>  F:	samples/bpf/
>  F:	scripts/bpf_doc.py
> +F:	scripts/pahole-flags.sh
>  F:	tools/bpf/
>  F:	tools/lib/bpf/
>  F:	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> -- 
> 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
> 

No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be
making new patches against them, right?

thanks,

greg k-h