lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae842a00-497a-e70d-e9c9-1a5316da93fa@starfivetech.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:17:06 +0800
From:   Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
CC:     <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>,
        "Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/19] clk: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock
 driver

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:12:43 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:46:37AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
>> From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
>> 
>> Add driver for the StarFive JH7110 system clock controller and
>> register an auxiliary device for system reset controller which
>> is named as "reset-sys".
>> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> How is this Reported-by lkp?
> If lkp responded to your patch saying there was a problem with it, it
> doesn't get a Reported-by - just like how any other reviewer doesn't get
> a Reported-by for pointing out build issues ;)
> You only need to add that for bugs it reports on patches that have
> already been applied ;)

I don't know. I just saw the following message in [1]. I will remove
it as you suggested. Ditto for the other patches. Thank you.

"If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>"

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202212231726.ZYGFg045-lkp@intel.com/

Best regards,
Hal

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
>> Co-developed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ