[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df054fae-5195-1ef8-c72e-e5afe8d901d3@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:06:26 +0530
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <treding@...dia.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<mmaddireddy@...dia.com>, <kw@...ux.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<vidyas@...dia.com>, <sanjayc@...dia.com>, <ksitaraman@...dia.com>,
<ishah@...dia.com>, <bbasu@...dia.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 7/9] cpufreq: tegra194: add OPP support and set
bandwidth
On 22/02/23 09:33, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 20-02-23, 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> +static int tegra_cpufreq_set_bw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned long freq_khz)
>> +{
>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
>> + if (!dev)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq_khz * KHZ, true);
>> + if (IS_ERR(opp))
>> + return PTR_ERR(opp);
>> +
>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_opp(dev, opp);
>> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>
> What about dev_pm_opp_set_rate() instead ?
>
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> --
> viresh
Tried using it and got below crash. It seems to be coming because we
don't have clocks property within CPU node for SoC's having BPMP-FW.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
000000000000002e
....
Call trace:
clk_round_rate+0x38/0xd8
dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0xe4/0x1a8
tegra194_cpufreq_set_target+0x74/0x88
__cpufreq_driver_target+0x154/0x250
cpufreq_online+0x7b4/0x9ac
Thanks,
Sumit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists