[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230222040317.r2p6zlbumazymluc@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:33:17 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Cc: treding@...dia.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, rafael@...nel.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mmaddireddy@...dia.com, kw@...ux.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, vidyas@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com,
ksitaraman@...dia.com, ishah@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 7/9] cpufreq: tegra194: add OPP support and set
bandwidth
On 20-02-23, 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> +static int tegra_cpufreq_set_bw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned long freq_khz)
> +{
> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
> + if (!dev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq_khz * KHZ, true);
> + if (IS_ERR(opp))
> + return PTR_ERR(opp);
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_opp(dev, opp);
> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
What about dev_pm_opp_set_rate() instead ?
> + return ret;
> +}
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists