[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/duxo1aKFibuZtF@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:48:54 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>
Cc: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>,
"mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/27] kbuild, mfd: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
> On 22/02/2023 12:15, Nick Alcock wrote:
> >Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message.
> >
> >So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules.
>
> Makes sense - but if you need to do a V2, would you mind removing the erroneous claim on DA9055 at the same time?
Could you do this anyway please. While you're at it, please remove the
'kbuild' reference from the subject line, thanks.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/mfd/Kconfig#L364
> Strangely, seems it was always there, yet always bool...
>
> Reviewed-by: Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>
Thanks Adam.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists