linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/27] kbuild, mfd: remove MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:24:33 +0000
From:   Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>,
        "mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/27] kbuild, mfd: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules

On 23 Feb 2023, Lee Jones stated:

> On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
>
>> On 22/02/2023 12:15, Nick Alcock wrote:
>> >Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message.
>> >
>> >So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules.
>> 
>> Makes sense - but if you need to do a V2, would you mind removing the erroneous claim on DA9055 at the same time?

I don't know what this means. There are two references to DA9055 in this
patch, both in context (not in modified lines), one in
drivers/mfd/da9055-core.c, the other in rivers/mfd/da9055-i2c.c. To me
these both seem likely to be DA9055-related. Are you saying that one of
them isn't?

> Could you do this anyway please.  While you're at it, please remove the
> 'kbuild' reference from the subject line, thanks.

I was going to say that it seems to be in active use, but I just checked
and a total of zero files touched by this series have ever used 'kbuild'
in their log prefixes anywhere. So... dropped, series-wide. (By the
overdesigned approach of using a kbuild: prefix if and only if at least
one file in the files touched in that commit has used that prefix
somewhere in its history.)

-- 
NULL && (void)