linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix snprintf format warnings during 'alsa' kselftest compilation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/eAyrYs+wEu180d@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:05:46 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
Cc:     perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, shuah@...nel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix snprintf format warnings during 'alsa' kselftest
 compilation

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 05:32:14PM +0300, Ivan Orlov wrote:
> Fix 'alsa' kselftest compilation warnings by making snprintf
> format correspond the actual parameters types.

What warnings are you seeing in what configuration (arch, toolchain, any
custom options...)?  I'm not seeing anything when I test.  Are these
perhaps architecture dependent warnings?

Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)