[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/iqhsEIvHgnZ+5l@surfacebook>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:16:06 +0200
From: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
To: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, tony@...mide.com,
lee@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@...ticallink.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: tps65219: add GPIO support for TPS65219 PMIC
Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Jerome Neanne kirjoitti:
> Add support for TPS65219 PMICs GPIO interface.
>
> 3 GPIO pins:
> - GPIO0 only is IO but input mode reserved for MULTI_DEVICE_ENABLE usage
> - GPIO1 and GPIO2 are Output only and referred as GPO1 and GPO2 in spec
>
> GPIO0 is statically configured as input or output prior to linux boot.
Linux
> it is used for MULTI_DEVICE_ENABLE function.
> This setting is statically configured by NVM.
> GPIO0 can't be used as a generic GPIO (specification Table 8-34).
> It's either a GPO when MULTI_DEVICE_EN=0
> or a GPI when MULTI_DEVICE_EN=1.
Something wrong with the indentation.
> Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps65219.pdf
Can it be Datasheet tag?
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@...ticallink.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>
Not sure how to interpet this along with the From line.
...
> +config GPIO_TPS65219
> + tristate "TPS65219 GPIO"
> + depends on MFD_TPS65219
> + help
> + Select this option to enable GPIO driver for the TPS65219
> + chip family.
> + GPIO0 is statically configured as input or output prior to linux boot.
> + it is used for MULTI_DEVICE_ENABLE function.
> + This setting is statically configured by NVM.
> + GPIO0 can't be used as a generic GPIO.
> + It's either a GPO when MULTI_DEVICE_EN=0
> + or a GPI when MULTI_DEVICE_EN=1.
Similar issues as with commit message. Also if chosen as M, how will it be
called?
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/tps65219.h>
> +
> +#define TPS65219_GPIO0_DIR_MASK BIT(3)
> +#define TPS65219_GPIO0_OFFSET 2
> +#define TPS65219_GPIO0_IDX 0
> +#define TPS65219_GPIO_DIR_IN 1
> +#define TPS65219_GPIO_DIR_OUT 0
> +
> +struct tps65219_gpio {
> + struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
> + struct tps65219 *tps;
> +};
...
> +static void tps65219_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
> + int value)
> +{
> + struct tps65219_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +
> + if (offset != TPS65219_GPIO0_IDX)
> + regmap_update_bits(gpio->tps->regmap,
> + TPS65219_REG_GENERAL_CONFIG,
> + BIT(offset - 1), value ? BIT(offset - 1) : 0);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(gpio->tps->regmap,
> + TPS65219_REG_GENERAL_CONFIG,
> + BIT(TPS65219_GPIO0_OFFSET),
> + value ? BIT(TPS65219_GPIO0_OFFSET) : 0);
With tenporary variables for value and mask this can be simplified.
bit = (offset == _IDX) ? GPIO0_OFFSET : offset - 1;
mask = BIT(bit);
v = value ? mask : 0;
regmap_update_bits(..., mask, v);
> +}
...
> +static int tps65219_gpio_change_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
> + unsigned int direction)
> +{
> + struct tps65219_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +
> + /* Documentation is stating that GPIO0 direction must not be changed in Linux:
> + * Table 8-34. MFP_1_CONFIG(3): MULTI_DEVICE_ENABLE,
> + * Should only be changed in INITIALIZE state (prior to ON Request).
> + * Set statically by NVM, changing direction in application can cause a hang.
> + * Below can be used for test purpose only:
You may rather put code into #if 0 ... #endif, so it will be easier to get the
test. Also, probably you would need to take care about error handling properly.
> + * ret = regmap_update_bits(gpio->tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_MFP_1_CONFIG,
> + * TPS65219_GPIO0_DIR_MASK, direction);
> + */
> + dev_err(gpio->tps->dev,
> + "GPIO%d direction set by NVM, change to %u failed, not allowed by specification\n",
> + offset, direction);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
...
> +static struct platform_driver tps65219_gpio_driver = {
> + .driver = {.name = "tps65219-gpio",},
Can you write it as
.driver = {
...
},
?
> + .probe = tps65219_gpio_probe,
> +};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists