[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/jQSUpXH5XwQTqg@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 07:57:13 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, conor@...nel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 2/2] RISC-V: enable building the 64-bit kernels with
rust support
Hi Conor,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:50:44PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>
> The rust modules work on 64-bit RISC-V, with no twiddling required.
> Select HAS_RUST and provide the required flags to kbuild so that the
> modules can be used.
> 32-bit is broken in core rust code, so support is limited to 64-bit
> only: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __udivdi3
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/Makefile | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> index 6982b63775da..197919158596 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> @@ -15,5 +15,7 @@ support corresponds to ``S`` values in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file.
> ============ ================ ==============================================
> Architecture Level of support Constraints
> ============ ================ ==============================================
> +``riscv`` Maintained ``rv64`` only.
> +============ ================ ==============================================
> ``x86`` Maintained ``x86_64`` only.
> ============ ================ ==============================================
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 81eb031887d2..73174157212d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ config RISCV
> select HAVE_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
> select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> select HAVE_RSEQ
> + select HAVE_RUST if 64BIT
Just a small drive by comment, you have 'if 64BIT' here...
> select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> index 76989561566b..0d6fc4e25221 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I),y)
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mabi=lp64
> KBUILD_AFLAGS += -mabi=lp64
> -
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -melf64lriscv
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv64
> else
> BITS := 32
> UTS_MACHINE := riscv32
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mabi=ilp32
> KBUILD_AFLAGS += -mabi=ilp32
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -melf32lriscv
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv32
but also add KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS for the !64BIT case. Seems like one of
those can be removed.
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD),y)
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists