[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/jXayJucRFxzJGA@wendy>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:27:39 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <conor@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 2/2] RISC-V: enable building the 64-bit kernels with
rust support
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 07:57:13AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:50:44PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> >
> > The rust modules work on 64-bit RISC-V, with no twiddling required.
> > Select HAS_RUST and provide the required flags to kbuild so that the
> > modules can be used.
> > 32-bit is broken in core rust code, so support is limited to 64-bit
> > only: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __udivdi3
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst | 2 ++
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/Makefile | 3 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> > index 6982b63775da..197919158596 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> > @@ -15,5 +15,7 @@ support corresponds to ``S`` values in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file.
> > ============ ================ ==============================================
> > Architecture Level of support Constraints
> > ============ ================ ==============================================
> > +``riscv`` Maintained ``rv64`` only.
> > +============ ================ ==============================================
> > ``x86`` Maintained ``x86_64`` only.
> > ============ ================ ==============================================
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 81eb031887d2..73174157212d 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ config RISCV
> > select HAVE_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
> > select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> > select HAVE_RSEQ
> > + select HAVE_RUST if 64BIT
>
> Just a small drive by comment, you have 'if 64BIT' here...
>
> > select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
> > select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> > select IRQ_DOMAIN
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > index 76989561566b..0d6fc4e25221 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I),y)
> >
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mabi=lp64
> > KBUILD_AFLAGS += -mabi=lp64
> > -
> > KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -melf64lriscv
> > + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv64
> > else
> > BITS := 32
> > UTS_MACHINE := riscv32
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ else
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mabi=ilp32
> > KBUILD_AFLAGS += -mabi=ilp32
> > KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -melf32lriscv
> > + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv32
>
> but also add KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS for the !64BIT case. Seems like one of
> those can be removed.
Yeah & it's ditto for the rv32 handling in 1/2 as well. Ideally there
wouldn't be implicit 64-bit division and the "if 64BIT" could go
away. I just left things as-lifted, but I'll go drop anything 32-bit
related if this series looses the RFC prefix ;)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists