[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB9PR10MB58815DECFF54F6D69E738ED8E0AC9@DB9PR10MB5881.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 07:08:42 +0000
From: "Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] tty: n_gsm: add ioctl for DLC specific parameter
configuration
> > +static void gsm_dlci_copy_config_values(struct gsm_dlci *dlci, struct gsm_dlci_config *dc)
> > +{
> > + memset(dc, 0, sizeof(*dc));
> > + dc->channel = (u32)dlci->addr;
> > + dc->adaption = (u32)dlci->adaption;
> > + dc->mtu = (u32)dlci->mtu;
> > + dc->priority = (u32)dlci->prio;
> > + if (dlci->ftype == UIH)
> > + dc->i = 1;
> > + else
> > + dc->i = 2;
> > + dc->k = (u32)dlci->k;
>
> Why all those casts?
These fields in 'dlci' differ either in size and/or signedness from the
values of the ioctl structure for historic reasons. That is why I perform
explicit casts here.
> > + if ((int)dc->adaption != dlci->adaption)
> > + need_restart = true;
> > + if ((unsigned int)dc->mtu != dlci->mtu)
> > + need_restart = true;
> > + if ((u8)dc->i != dlci->ftype)
> > + need_restart = true;
> > + /* Requires care */
> > + if ((u8)dc->priority != (u32)dlci->prio)
> > + need_restart = true;
>
> And here.
I will remove these.
> > + if (dlci->mtu)
>
> dc->mtu?
Right, my mistake. Will be corrected in the next version of this patch.
Best regards,
Daniel Starke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists