| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:18:51 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] migrate_pages: try migrate in batch asynchronously
firstly
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> writes:
> On 2/24/2023 10:11 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
>> When we have locked more than one folios, we cannot wait the lock or
>> bit (e.g., page lock, buffer head lock, writeback bit) synchronously.
>> Otherwise deadlock may be triggered. This make it hard to batch the
>> synchronous migration directly.
>> This patch re-enables batching synchronous migration via trying to
>> migrate in batch asynchronously firstly. And any folios that are
>> failed to be migrated asynchronously will be migrated synchronously
>> one by one.
>> Test shows that this can restore the TLB flushing batching
>> performance
>> for synchronous migration effectively.
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
>> Cc: "Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> Cc: Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>
>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
>> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/migrate.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index 91198b487e49..c17ce5ee8d92 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -1843,6 +1843,51 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> return rc;
>> }
>> +static int migrate_pages_sync(struct list_head *from, new_page_t
>> get_new_page,
>> + free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private,
>> + enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, struct list_head *ret_folios,
>> + struct list_head *split_folios, struct migrate_pages_stats *stats)
>> +{
>> + int rc, nr_failed = 0;
>> + LIST_HEAD(folios);
>> + struct migrate_pages_stats astats;
>> +
>> + memset(&astats, 0, sizeof(astats));
>> + /* Try to migrate in batch with MIGRATE_ASYNC mode firstly */
>> + rc = migrate_pages_batch(from, get_new_page, put_new_page, private, MIGRATE_ASYNC,
>> + reason, &folios, split_folios, &astats,
>> + NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
>> + stats->nr_succeeded += astats.nr_succeeded;
>> + stats->nr_thp_succeeded += astats.nr_thp_succeeded;
>> + stats->nr_thp_split += astats.nr_thp_split;
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + stats->nr_failed_pages += astats.nr_failed_pages;
>> + stats->nr_thp_failed += astats.nr_thp_failed;
>> + list_splice_tail(&folios, ret_folios);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> + stats->nr_thp_failed += astats.nr_thp_split;
>> + nr_failed += astats.nr_thp_split;
>> + /*
>> + * Fall back to migrate all failed folios one by one synchronously. All
>> + * failed folios except split THPs will be retried, so their failure
>> + * isn't counted
>> + */
>> + list_splice_tail_init(&folios, from);
>> + while (!list_empty(from)) {
>> + list_move(from->next, &folios);
>> + rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page,
>> + private, mode, reason, ret_folios,
>> + split_folios, stats, NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
>> + list_splice_tail_init(&folios, ret_folios);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> + nr_failed += rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return nr_failed;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * migrate_pages - migrate the folios specified in a list, to the free folios
>> * supplied as the target for the page migration
>> @@ -1874,7 +1919,7 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, unsigned int *ret_succeeded)
>> {
>> int rc, rc_gather;
>> - int nr_pages, batch;
>> + int nr_pages;
>> struct folio *folio, *folio2;
>> LIST_HEAD(folios);
>> LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
>> @@ -1890,10 +1935,6 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> if (rc_gather < 0)
>> goto out;
>> - if (mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
>> - batch = NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION;
>> - else
>> - batch = 1;
>> again:
>> nr_pages = 0;
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, folio2, from, lru) {
>> @@ -1904,16 +1945,20 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> }
>> nr_pages += folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> - if (nr_pages >= batch)
>> + if (nr_pages >= NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION)
>> break;
>> }
>> - if (nr_pages >= batch)
>> + if (nr_pages >= NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION)
>> list_cut_before(&folios, from, &folio2->lru);
>> else
>> list_splice_init(from, &folios);
>> - rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
>> - mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats,
>> - NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
>> + if (mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
>> + rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
>> + mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats,
>> + NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
>> + else
>> + rc = migrate_pages_sync(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
>> + mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats);
>
> For split folios, it seems also reasonable to use migrate_pages_sync()
> instead of always using fixed MIGRATE_ASYNC mode?
For split folios, we only try to migrate them with minimal effort.
Previously, we decrease the retry number from 10 to 1. Now, I think
that it's reasonable to change the migration mode to MIGRATE_ASYNC to
reduce latency. They have been counted as failure anyway.
>> list_splice_tail_init(&folios, &ret_folios);
>> if (rc < 0) {
>> rc_gather = rc;
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists