[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230301130613.GC467@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:06:13 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
mpe@...erman.id.au, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
robin.murphy@....com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of: address: Always use dma_default_coherent
for default coherency
> - select OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT if !NOT_COHERENT_CACHE
Doesn't powerpc need to select CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT now,
or even better should be doing that in the patch adding that
symbol?
In fact I wonder if adding CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT and removing
OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT should be one patch, as that seems to bring
over the intent a little better I'd say.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists