linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Core RAPL for AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d31ec11-cc4d-b6ed-8656-d23257e5af95@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2023 00:02:53 +0530
From:   Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
To:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, hpa@...or.com
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gautham.shenoy@....com,
        ananth.narayan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Core RAPL for AMD

Hi Oleksandr,

On 2/19/2023 5:22 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On pátek 17. února 2023 17:13:54 CET Wyes Karny wrote:
>> AMD processors support per-package and per-core energy monitoring
>> through RAPL counters which can be accessed by users running in
>> supervisor mode.
>>
>> Core RAPL counters gives power consumption information per core.  For
>> AMD processors the package level RAPL counter are already exposed to
>> perf. Expose the core level RAPL counters also.
>>
>> sudo perf stat -a --per-core -C 0-127 -e power/energy-cores/
>>
>> Output:
>> S0-D0-C0           2               8.73 Joules power/energy-cores/
>> S0-D0-C1           2               8.73 Joules power/energy-cores/
>> S0-D0-C2           2               8.73 Joules power/energy-cores/
>> S0-D0-C3           2               8.73 Joules power/energy-cores/
>> S0-D0-C4           2               8.73 Joules power/energy-cores/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> index 52e6e7ed4f78..d301bbbc3b93 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static struct perf_msr intel_rapl_spr_msrs[] = {
>>   * - want to use same event codes across both architectures
>>   */
>>  static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
>> -	[PERF_RAPL_PP0]  = { 0, &rapl_events_cores_group, 0, false, 0 },
>> +	[PERF_RAPL_PP0]  = { MSR_AMD_CORE_ENERGY_STATUS, &rapl_events_cores_group, test_msr, false, RAPL_MSR_MASK },
>>  	[PERF_RAPL_PKG]  = { MSR_AMD_PKG_ENERGY_STATUS,  &rapl_events_pkg_group,   test_msr, false, RAPL_MSR_MASK },
>>  	[PERF_RAPL_RAM]  = { 0, &rapl_events_ram_group,   0, false, 0 },
>>  	[PERF_RAPL_PP1]  = { 0, &rapl_events_gpu_group,   0, false, 0 },
>> @@ -764,7 +764,8 @@ static struct rapl_model model_spr = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  static struct rapl_model model_amd_hygon = {
>> -	.events		= BIT(PERF_RAPL_PKG),
>> +	.events		= BIT(PERF_RAPL_PP0) |
>> +			  BIT(PERF_RAPL_PKG),
>>  	.msr_power_unit = MSR_AMD_RAPL_POWER_UNIT,
>>  	.rapl_msrs      = amd_rapl_msrs,
>>  };
>>
> 
> With this patch:
> 
> ```
> $ lscpu | grep 'Model name'
> Model name:                      AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
> 
> $ sudo perf stat -a --per-core -C 0-15 -e power/energy-cores/ -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100000
> 100000+0 records in
> 100000+0 records out
> 104857600000 bytes (105 GB, 98 GiB) copied, 1,59252 s, 65,8 GB/s
> 
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> 
> S0-D0-C0           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C1           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C2           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C3           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C4           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C5           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C6           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C7           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C8           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C9           1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C10          1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C11          1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C12          1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C13          1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C14          1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> S0-D0-C15          1               1,56 Joules power/energy-cores/
> 
> 1,593982452 seconds time elapsed
> ```
> 
> Hence,
> 
> Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>

I haven't put your tested-by tag in v2 as I've added a new patch there.
Please let me know if v2 works well for you and if I can add tested-by on v2.
 
> 
> Thank you.
> 

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Wyes