[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZACrOWKWdVYO/EAI@x1n>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 08:57:13 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/uffd: UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 10:37:44AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Especially for such large sparse VMAs, the current way of allocating
> pagetables to place markers/zeropages is far from optimal.
IMHO that's not a generic workload. As mentioned in the reply there, I
would suggest we go with simple then we have space to optimize it in the
future if necessary, because the API will be the same.
If I want to monitor a super sparse VMA on dirty, one thing I can already
try is register with MISSING + WP (!WP_UNPOPULATED). It may be a good
intermediate solution to avoid any marker ovearheads.
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists