[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <982c1623-ac28-2743-d6a3-4faf42f72d47@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 15:01:26 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/uffd: UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED
On 02.03.23 14:57, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 10:37:44AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Especially for such large sparse VMAs, the current way of allocating
>> pagetables to place markers/zeropages is far from optimal.
>
> IMHO that's not a generic workload. As mentioned in the reply there, I
> would suggest we go with simple then we have space to optimize it in the
> future if necessary, because the API will be the same.
>
I disagree with "generic workload", we use sparse mmaps all over the
place, and when blindly used by e.g., CRIU, we'll simply end up wasting
memory and time.
But I already agreed that this optimization that is a separate thing to
implement.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists