linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:28:33 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness
 grouping

On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 08:58:55 -0800 Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:

> > > +               for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_70; fg <= ZS_INUSE_RATIO_99; fg++)
> > > +                       class_almost_full = zs_stat_get(class, fg);
> > > +               for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10; fg < ZS_INUSE_RATIO_70; fg++)
> > > +                       class_almost_empty = zs_stat_get(class, fg);
> >
> > Aren't these supposed to be += ?
> 
> Looks like they are removed by a following patch anyway.

I'll fix that up anyway, to avoid a bisection hole.  And in case [patch 4/4]
gets dropped from the series or is later reverted or whatever.