linux-kernel - Re: [V2 PATCH 0/6] KVM: selftests: selftests for fd-based private memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 06 Mar 2023 18:21:24 +0000
From:   Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
To:     Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     vannapurve@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        shuah@...nel.org, yang.zhong@...el.com, ricarkol@...gle.com,
        aaronlewis@...gle.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, hughd@...gle.com,
        jlayton@...nel.org, bfields@...ldses.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com,
        jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        michael.roth@....com, qperret@...gle.com, steven.price@....com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
        vbabka@...e.cz, marcorr@...gle.com, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
        pgonda@...gle.com, nikunj@....com, diviness@...gle.com,
        maz@...nel.org, dmatlack@...gle.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
        maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com, mizhang@...gle.com, bgardon@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 0/6] KVM: selftests: selftests for fd-based private memory

Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:59:23AM -0800, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:11 PM Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>  
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > ...

>> > > Last question, do you have a list of testcases that you  
>> consider "required" for
>> > > UPM?  My off-the-cuff list of selftests I want to have before  
>> merging UPM is pretty
>> > > short at this point:
>> > >
>> > >   - Negative testing of the memslot changes, e.g. bad alignment, bad  
>> fd,
>> > >     illegal memslot updates, etc.
>> > >   - Negative testing of restrictedmem, e.g. various combinations of  
>> overlapping
>> > >     bindings of a single restrictedmem instance.
>> > >   - Access vs. conversion stress, e.g. accessing a region in the  
>> guest while it's
>> > >     concurrently converted by the host, maybe with fancy guest code  
>> to try and
>> > >     detect TLB or ordering bugs?
>> >
>> > List of testcases that I was tracking (covered by the current
>> > selftests) as required:
>> > 1) Ensure private memory contents are not accessible to host userspace
>> > using the HVA
>> > 2) Ensure shared memory contents are visible/accessible from both host
>> > userspace and the guest
>> > 3) Ensure 1 and 2 holds across explicit memory conversions
>> > 4) Exercise memory conversions with mixed shared/private memory pages
>> > in a huge page to catch issues like [2]
>> > 5) Ensure that explicit memory conversions don't affect nearby GPA  
>> ranges
>> >
>> > Test Cases that will be covered by TDX/SNP selftests (in addition to
>> > above scenarios):
>> > 6) Ensure 1 and 2 holds across implicit memory conversions
>> > 7) Ensure that implicit memory conversions don't affect nearby GPA  
>> ranges
>> >
>> > Additional testcases possible:
>> > 8) Running conversion tests for non-overlapping GPA ranges of
>> > same/different memslots from multiple vcpus
>> >
>> > [1] -  
>> https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/commit/7e536bf3c45c623425bc84e8a96634efc3a619ed
>> > [2] -  
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAGtprH82H_fjtRbL0KUxOkgOk4pgbaEbAydDYfZ0qxz41JCnAQ@mail.gmail.com/

>> List of additional testcases that could help increase basic coverage
>> (including what sean mentioned earlier):
>> 1) restrictedmem functionality testing
>>      - read/write/mmap should not work
>>      - fstat/fallocate should work as expected
>> 2) restrictedmem registration/modification testing with:
>>      - bad alignment, bad fd, modifying properties of existing memslot
>>      - Installing multiple memslots with ranges within the same
>> restricted mem files
>>      - deleting memslots with restricted memfd while guests are being  
>> executed

> In case you havn't started, I will work on 1) and 2) for the following
> days. As a start, I will first add restrictedmem tests (without KVM) then
> move to new memslots related tests.

> Chao

>> 3) Runtime restricted mem testing:
>>      - Access vs conversion testing from multiple vcpus
>>      - conversion and access to non-overlapping ranges from multiple vcpus

>> Regards,
>> Vishal

Chao, I'll work on

+ Running conversion tests for non-overlapping GPA ranges of
   same/different memslots from multiple vcpus
+ Deleting memslots with restricted memfd while guests are being
   executed
+ Installing multiple memslots with ranges within the same restricted
   mem files

this week.