[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <beb3ce07-b431-11e9-744e-bb632c2069db@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:49:17 +0530
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<treding@...dia.com>, <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>,
<kw@...ux.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <vidyas@...dia.com>,
<sanjayc@...dia.com>, <ksitaraman@...dia.com>, <ishah@...dia.com>,
<bbasu@...dia.com>, Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/9] Tegra234 Memory interconnect support
On 06/03/23 20:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 20/02/2023 15:05, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> This patch series adds memory interconnect support for Tegra234 SoC.
>> It is used to dynamically scale DRAM Frequency as per the bandwidth
>> requests from different Memory Controller (MC) clients.
>> MC Clients use ICC Framework's icc_set_bw() api to dynamically request
>> for the DRAM bandwidth (BW). As per path, the request will be routed
>> from MC to the EMC driver. MC driver passes the request info like the
>> Client ID, type, and frequency request info to the BPMP-FW which will
>> set the final DRAM freq considering all exisiting requests.
>>
>> MC and EMC are the ICC providers. Nodes in path for a request will be:
>> Client[1-n] -> MC -> EMC -> EMEM/DRAM
>>
>> The patch series also adds interconnect support in below client drivers:
>> 1) CPUFREQ driver for scaling bandwidth with CPU frequency. For that,
>> added per cluster OPP table which will be used in the CPUFREQ driver
>> by requesting the minimum BW respective to the given CPU frequency in
>> the OPP table of given cluster.
>> 2) PCIE driver to request BW required for different modes.
>
> No dependencies or ordering written, so I am free to take memory
> controller bits, I assume.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Apologies for not mentioning the order in cover letter. The patches are
divided into below groups.
Patch [9]: Memory Interconnect support in PCI (MC client)
Patch [4-8]: Memory Interconnect support in CPUFREQ (MC client)
Patch [1-3]: Memory Interconnect base support
Both the Memory Controller (MC) client patches are dependent on the
'Memory Interconnect base support patch [1-3]'.
Thanks,
Sumit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists