[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22525720-9def-27de-cf41-8fd8165d6e01@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:07:35 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, treding@...dia.com,
dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rafael@...nel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mmaddireddy@...dia.com, kw@...ux.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, vidyas@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com,
ksitaraman@...dia.com, ishah@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/9] Tegra234 Memory interconnect support
On 06/03/2023 16:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/02/2023 15:05, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> This patch series adds memory interconnect support for Tegra234 SoC.
>> It is used to dynamically scale DRAM Frequency as per the bandwidth
>> requests from different Memory Controller (MC) clients.
>> MC Clients use ICC Framework's icc_set_bw() api to dynamically request
>> for the DRAM bandwidth (BW). As per path, the request will be routed
>> from MC to the EMC driver. MC driver passes the request info like the
>> Client ID, type, and frequency request info to the BPMP-FW which will
>> set the final DRAM freq considering all exisiting requests.
>>
>> MC and EMC are the ICC providers. Nodes in path for a request will be:
>> Client[1-n] -> MC -> EMC -> EMEM/DRAM
>>
>> The patch series also adds interconnect support in below client drivers:
>> 1) CPUFREQ driver for scaling bandwidth with CPU frequency. For that,
>> added per cluster OPP table which will be used in the CPUFREQ driver
>> by requesting the minimum BW respective to the given CPU frequency in
>> the OPP table of given cluster.
>> 2) PCIE driver to request BW required for different modes.
>
> No dependencies or ordering written, so I am free to take memory
> controller bits, I assume.
And not.. NAK, since you decided to ignore my comments. Really, we do
not have time for such useless ping pong.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists