linux-kernel - Re: [v5 PATCH 3/7] crypto: stm32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:28:41 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...s.st.com>,
        Li kunyu <kunyu@...china.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH 3/7] crypto: stm32 - Simplify finup

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> The current finup code is unnecessarily convoluted.  There is no
> need to call update and final separately as update already does
> all the necessary work on its own.
>
> Simplify this by utilising the HASH_FLAGS_FINUP bit in rctx to
> indicate only finup and use the HASH_FLAGS_FINAL bit instead to
> signify processing common to both final and finup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

This "v5.5 version" indeed works!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

I had to pick the patch manually because Konstantin's b4 tool
got completely confused by the version numbering and picked
the old v5, but once I got the right one, all worked fine!

Yours,
Linus Walleij