[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZj5Ou75TN4pFjDU==5=6nSzBtsszzOiL3U3D3JK=RLqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:59:06 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...s.st.com>,
Li kunyu <kunyu@...china.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH 5/7] crypto: stm32 - Move hash state into separate structure
Hi Herbert,
thanks for keeping going at this!
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Create a new struct stm32_hash_state so that it may be exported
> in future instead of the entire request context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
First the patch bugged but I found the problem in a small semantic
glitch:
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c
b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c
index de8275a80271..3743f55b5c04 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int stm32_hash_final_req(struct stm32_hash_dev *hdev)
if (state->flags & HASH_FLAGS_FINUP)
return stm32_hash_update_req(hdev);
- return stm32_hash_xmit_cpu(hdev, state->buffer, state->buflen, 1);
+ return stm32_hash_xmit_cpu(hdev, state->buffer, state->bufcnt, 1);
}
static void stm32_hash_emptymsg_fallback(struct ahash_request *req)
Afte this all (extended) tests pass fine.
Just fold in this and you can add:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists