[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN+4W8hX4V+VTMFjE-1WUVrpHoh1G_e07cTArL5W4AKwVNr0_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:26:25 +0000
From: Lorenz Bauer <lorenz.bauer@...valent.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btf: fix resolving BTF_KIND_VAR after ARRAY, STRUCT,
UNION, PTR
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 12:16 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> lgtm. Could it be moved out of the for loop?
Yeah, that is possible I think, since we can only trigger the problem if
return env_stack_push()
Is executed. I'll send a v2.
> Please add the test case described in the commit message to the prog_tests/btf.c.
Good point, I'll send this as a separate commit. Backporting patches
doesn't work well in my experience.
Thanks for your review!
Lorenz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists