[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a872110-3f38-0744-17f1-74de3e78f84d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:28:05 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>, Rijo-john.Thomas@....com,
Thomas.Lendacky@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] i2c: designware: Add support for AMDI0020 ACPI ID
On 3/6/23 14:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:50:47AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> Cezanne and Skyrim have the same PSP hardware but use a different
>> protocol to negotiate I2C arbitration. To disambiguate this going
>> forward introduce a new ACPI ID to represent the protocol that utilizes
>> a doorbell.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>> ---
>> v2->v3:
>> * Split from earlier patch to standalone
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c | 5 +++--
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
>> index 2c671973010d..44b8432458b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
>> @@ -101,11 +101,12 @@ static int psp_send_i2c_req_amdi0019(enum psp_i2c_req_type i2c_req_type)
>>
>> static int psp_send_i2c_req(enum psp_i2c_req_type i2c_req_type)
>> {
>> + const char *hid = acpi_device_hid(ACPI_COMPANION(psp_i2c_dev));
>> unsigned long start = jiffies;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - /* Use doorbell for Skyrim and mailbox for Cezanne */
>> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 25 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 80)
>
> Ah, in this form it's getting better than I thought!
>
These removed lines were added by previous patch. I think a bit too
short lived if the same patchset adds and then removes lines?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists