[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAXiviOdddEK/Pak@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:55:26 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>, Rijo-john.Thomas@....com,
Thomas.Lendacky@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] i2c: designware: Add support for AMDI0020 ACPI ID
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:28:05PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 3/6/23 14:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:50:47AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > Cezanne and Skyrim have the same PSP hardware but use a different
> > > protocol to negotiate I2C arbitration. To disambiguate this going
> > > forward introduce a new ACPI ID to represent the protocol that utilizes
> > > a doorbell.
...
> > > - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 25 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 80)
> >
> > Ah, in this form it's getting better than I thought!
> >
> These removed lines were added by previous patch. I think a bit too short
> lived if the same patchset adds and then removes lines?
That what I have missed. Okay, coming to square 1, i.e. dropping CPU ID
completely from the series.
Note, for testing purposes you may always add a HACK patch at the end of the
series, marking it respectively. So, people may test it all and maintainer
apply w/o unneeded tail.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists