[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73f5261d-e170-ab27-cb4c-fc15bfd4c613@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 08:45:39 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
jarkko@...nel.org, naoya.horiguchi@....com, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: xiexiuqi@...wei.com, lvying6@...wei.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with
proper si_code
Gentle ping.
On 2023/2/27 PM1:03, Shuai Xue wrote:
> changes since v1:
> - synchronous events by notify type
> - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221206153354.92394-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com/
>
> Currently, both synchronous and asynchronous error are queued and handled
> by a dedicated kthread in workqueue. And Memory failure for synchronous
> error is synced by a cancel_work_sync trick which ensures that the
> corrupted page is unmapped and poisoned. And after returning to user-space,
> the task starts at current instruction which triggering a page fault in
> which kernel will send SIGBUS to current process due to VM_FAULT_HWPOISON.
>
> However, the memory failure recovery for hwpoison-aware mechanisms does not
> work as expected. For example, hwpoison-aware user-space processes like
> QEMU register their customized SIGBUS handler and enable early kill mode by
> seting PF_MCE_EARLY at initialization. Then the kernel will directy notify
> the process by sending a SIGBUS signal in memory failure with wrong
> si_code: BUS_MCEERR_AO si_code to the actual user-space process instead of
> BUS_MCEERR_AR.
>
> To address this problem:
>
> - PATCH 1 sets mf_flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events which
> indicates error happened in current execution context
> - PATCH 2 separates synchronous error handling into task work so that the
> current context in memory failure is exactly belongs to the task
> consuming poison data.
>
> Then, kernel will send SIGBUS with proper si_code in kill_proc().
>
> Lv Ying and XiuQi also proposed to address similar problem and we discussed
> about new solution to add a new flag(acpi_hest_generic_data::flags bit 8) to
> distinguish synchronous event. [2][3] The UEFI community still has no response.
> After a deep dive into the SDEI TRM, the SDEI notification should be used for
> asynchronous error. As SDEI TRM[1] describes "the dispatcher can simulate an
> exception-like entry into the client, **with the client providing an additional
> asynchronous entry point similar to an interrupt entry point**". The client
> (kernel) lacks complete synchronous context, e.g. systeam register (ELR, ESR,
> etc). So notify type is enough to distinguish synchronous event.
>
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0054/latest/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20221205160043.57465-4-xiexiuqi@huawei.com/T/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221209095407.383211-1-lvying6@huawei.com/
>
> Shuai Xue (2):
> ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on
> synchronous events
> ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work
>
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 -
> mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ----
> 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists