| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230316072031.GA354196@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 07:21:16 +0000
From: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"xiexiuqi@...wei.com" <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
"lvying6@...wei.com" <lvying6@...wei.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com" <cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com" <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as
MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 01:03:14PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> There are two major types of uncorrected recoverable (UCR) errors :
>
> - Action Required (AR): The error is detected and the processor already
> consumes the memory. OS requires to take action (for example, offline
> failure page/kill failure thread) to recover this uncorrectable error.
>
> - Action Optional (AO): The error is detected out of processor execution
> context. Some data in the memory are corrupted. But the data have not
> been consumed. OS is optional to take action to recover this
> uncorrectable error.
>
> The essential difference between AR and AO errors is that AR is a
> synchronous event, while AO is an asynchronous event. The hardware will
> signal a synchronous exception (Machine Check Exception on X86 and
> Synchronous External Abort on Arm64) when an error is detected and the
> memory access has been architecturally executed.
>
> When APEI firmware first is enabled, a platform may describe one error
> source for the handling of synchronous errors (e.g. MCE or SEA notification
> ), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI or External Interrupt
> notification). In other words, we can distinguish synchronous errors by
> APEI notification. For AR errors, kernel will kill current process
> accessing the poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AR. In
> addition, for AO errors, kernel will notify the process who owns the
> poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO in early kill mode.
> However, the GHES driver always sets mf_flags to 0 so that all UCR errors
> are handled as AO errors in memory failure.
>
> To this end, set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous
> events.
>
> Fixes: ba61ca4aab47 ("ACPI, APEI, GHES: Add hardware memory error recovery support")'
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 34ad071a64e9..5d37fb4bca67 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes)
> return ghes->generic->header.type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * A platform may describe one error source for the handling of synchronous
> + * errors (e.g. MCE or SEA), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI
> + * or External Interrupt).
> + */
> +static inline bool is_hest_sync_notify(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> + int notify_type = ghes->generic->notify.type;
> +
> + return notify_type == ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA ||
> + notify_type == ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE;
> +}
This code seems to read that all MCEs are synchronous, which I think is
not correct. The scenario I'm worrying about is that is_hest_sync_notify()
returns true when this code is called for AO MCE (so asynchronous one).
Then, ghes_do_memory_failure() (updated by your patch 2/2) will choose to
use task_work instead of memory_failure_queue(). This should not be expected.
Or does that never happen?
- Naoya Horiguchi
> +
> /*
> * This driver isn't really modular, however for the time being,
> * continuing to use module_param is the easiest way to remain
> @@ -477,7 +490,7 @@ static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
> }
>
> static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> - int sev)
> + int sev, bool sync)
> {
> int flags = -1;
> int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
> @@ -491,7 +504,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> (gdata->flags & CPER_SEC_ERROR_THRESHOLD_EXCEEDED))
> flags = MF_SOFT_OFFLINE;
> if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE && sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE)
> - flags = 0;
> + flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0;
>
> if (flags != -1)
> return ghes_do_memory_failure(mem_err->physical_addr, flags);
> @@ -499,12 +512,14 @@ static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sev)
> +static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> + int sev, bool sync)
> {
> struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
> bool queued = false;
> int sec_sev, i;
> char *p;
> + int flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0;
>
> log_arm_hw_error(err);
>
> @@ -526,7 +541,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int s
> * and don't filter out 'corrected' error here.
> */
> if (is_cache && has_pa) {
> - queued = ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, 0);
> + queued = ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, flags);
> p += err_info->length;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -647,6 +662,7 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> const guid_t *fru_id = &guid_null;
> char *fru_text = "";
> bool queued = false;
> + bool sync = is_hest_sync_notify(ghes);
>
> sev = ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity);
> apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata) {
> @@ -664,13 +680,13 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ghes_report_chain, sev, mem_err);
>
> arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> - queued = ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev);
> + queued = ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev, sync);
> }
> else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> ghes_handle_aer(gdata);
> }
> else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) {
> - queued = ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(gdata, sev);
> + queued = ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(gdata, sev, sync);
> } else {
> void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>
> --
> 2.20.1.12.g72788fdb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists