[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAdi0dc+6Jmq36Mn@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:14:09 +0000
From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"bsingharora@...il.com" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Syromiatnikov, Eugene" <esyr@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nadav.amit@...il.com" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"dethoma@...rosoft.com" <dethoma@...rosoft.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com" <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Schimpe, Christina" <christina.schimpe@...el.com>,
"debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"mike.kravetz@...cle.com" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>, "nd@....com" <nd@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"gorcunov@...il.com" <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/41] Documentation/x86: Add CET shadow stack
description
The 03/07/2023 15:00, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * szabolcs:
>
> > changing/disabling the alt stack is not valid while a handler is
> > executing on it. if we don't allow jumping out and back to an
> > alt stack (swapcontext) then there can be only one alt stack
> > live per thread and change/disable can do the shadow stack free.
> >
> > if jump back is allowed (linux even makes it race-free with
> > SS_AUTODISARM) then the life-time of alt stack is extended
> > beyond change/disable (jump back to an unregistered alt stack).
> >
> > to support jump back to an alt stack the requirements are
> >
> > 1) user has to manage an alt shadow stack together with the alt
> > stack (requies user code change, not just libc).
> >
> > 2) kernel has to push a restore token on the thread shadow stack
> > on signal entry (at least in case of alt shadow stack, and
> > deal with corner cases around shadow stack overflow).
>
> We need to have a story for stackful coroutine switching as well, not
> just for sigaltstack. I hope that we can use OpenJDK (Project Loom) and
> QEMU as guinea pigs. If we have something that works for both,
> hopefully that covers a broad range of scenarios. Userspace
> coordination can eventually be handled by glibc; we can deallocate
> alternate stacks on thread exit fairly easily (at least compared to the
> current stack 8-).
for stackful coroutines we just need a way to
- allocate a shadow stack with a restore token on it.
- switch to a target shadow stack with a restore token on it,
while leaving behind a restore token on the old shadow stack.
this is supported via map_shadow_stack syscall and the
rstoressp, saveprevssp instruction pair.
otoh there can be many alt shadow stacks per thread alive if
we allow jump back (only one of them registered at a time) in
fact they can be jumped to even from another thread, so their
life-time is not tied to the thread (at least if we allow
swapcontext across threads) so i think the libc cannot manage
the alt shadow stacks, only user code can in the general case.
and in case a signal runs on an alt shadow stack, the restore
token can only be placed by the kernel on the old shadow stack.
thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists