[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1edq0jg2h.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 18:40:48 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Lee Duncan <leeman.duncan@...il.com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Add BLIST_NO_ASK_VPD_SIZE for some VDASD
Lee,
> My worry is that this won't always work. Looking at the code, the
> buffer sizes used for VPD pages include 8, 32, 64, and 252 bytes. I'm
> not sure how reading 255 bytes into an 8-byte buffer would work.
In the scsi_get_vpd_buf() case we will allocate a 255 byte buffer since
that's what scsi_get_vpd_size() returns for a VDASD.
And in the scsi_get_vpd_page() case, where a buffer already exists, we
clamp the INQUIRY size to the minimum of scsi_get_vpd_size() and the
buffer length provided by the caller.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists