linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix slice configuration values for SC8280XP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  6 Mar 2023 20:20:26 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix slice configuration values for SC8280XP

On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:55:27 +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The slice IDs for CVPFW, CPUSS1 and CPUWHT currently overflow the 32bit
> LLCC config registers, which means it is writing beyond the upper limit
> of the ATTR0_CFGn and ATTR1_CFGn range of registers. But the most obvious
> impact is the fact that the mentioned slices do not get configured at all,
> which will result in reduced performance. Fix that by using the slice ID
> values taken from the latest LLCC SC table.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix slice configuration values for SC8280XP
      commit: 77bf4b3ed42e31d29b255fcd6530fb7a1e217e89

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>