linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 02/11] media: dt-bindings: starfive,jh7110-mipi-csi2: add binding docmuent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 08:53:05 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
        Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/11] media: dt-bindings: starfive,jh7110-mipi-csi2:
 add binding docmuent

On 07/03/2023 07:41, Jack Zhu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/3/3 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/03/2023 10:19, jack.zhu wrote:
>>> Add DT binding document for Starfive MIPI CSI2 receiver
>>
>> Ehh... you have entire commit msg to explain what you do here. Yet there
>> is nothing mentioning that you actually have Cadence MIPI CSI here.
>>
>> Since you decided to add new bindings, you receive review matching new
>> bindings. I don't think this is correct approach (duplicated bindings),
>> but could work for me. However how are you going to solve all the points
>> of my review?
> 
> Maybe I don't need to add the CSI yaml file, since it already exists on the Linux mainline.

If you add *only* new compatible, you do not need new binding. If you
add any new properties, then depends, but old binding anyway would need
conversion from TXT.

Best regards,
Krzysztof