lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:49:00 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>, s32@....com,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>,
        Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....nxp.com>,
        Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@....com>,
        Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add pinctrl support for S32 SoC family

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:22 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:28 AM <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Can you unpull this?
>
> > If need be.
> >
> > Are there serious issues with the patch set such that they cannot be fixed
> > by add-on patches?
>
> There are a few absent error checks, some error code shadowing, etc.
> I can't tell if these all are serious, but the amount of them is like a dozen.
>
> I reviewed the patch, so you can look into that yourself and decide.

I looked at it and some of the comments are pretty serious and need
addressing ASAP.

However it only affects this hardware so it's not like it's breaking the
world. I generally prefer in-tree development over too many big patch
iterations, it gets more focused.

I think if Chester can follow up with a patch or several addressing the
comments in the next week or two that's fine.

However if we get closer to -rc6 and nothing has happened I would
not be so happy and then I might just revert the driver patch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ