linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: clean unnecessary item

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:50:49 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: clean unnecessary item

On 07/03/2023 11:17, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 07/03/23 11:07, Alexandre Mergnat ha scritto:
>> The item which have the mediatek,mt8192-disp-ccorr as const compatible
>> already exist above. Merge all compatibles which have the same fallback
>> under the same item.
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
> 
> Alexandre, the Acked-by tag from Krzysztof goes *after* your S-o-b :-)

b4 puts them like this and there is even rationale from Konstantin about
it. Anyway, it's not submitters job to correct b4. Our tools should
implement the process, not us (the users), thus if the result is
incorrect, then the tool should be fixed. Not the user.

Best regards,
Krzysztof