linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: enable building 64-bit kernels with rust support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36af5bd6-883c-4968-8ace-2e31ec51907d@spud>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:51:55 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <conor@...nel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: enable building 64-bit kernels with rust
 support

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:56:30PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:01 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >
> > Cool. Git should resolve that, probably without even generating a
> > conflict in -next, right?
> 
> I think it will conflict.
> 
> Since the cleanup is elsewhere and it may add work for the -next
> maintainer, it is probably best to take it out in v2.

If you think it will conflict as-is, it's probably gonna conflict either
way.
You've pointed out several small bits, I'll send a v2 in a few days.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)