[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2012343.1678291479@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 16:04:39 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 03/13] overlayfs: Implement splice-read
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 03:54:36PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Using do_splice_to() as a helper is probably a good idea, though both Willy
> > and Christoph seem to dislike it.
>
> That's not true. What I'm fundamentlly against is pointless wrappers
> like the call_* that add no value. do_splice_to adds useful checks,
> so if properly named and documented, I'm absolutely in favour.
Fair enough. Rename to vfs_splice_read() okay with you?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists