[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230309092906.GA23816@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:29:07 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 03/13] overlayfs: Implement splice-read
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:04:39PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 03:54:36PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > > Using do_splice_to() as a helper is probably a good idea, though both Willy
> > > and Christoph seem to dislike it.
> >
> > That's not true. What I'm fundamentlly against is pointless wrappers
> > like the call_* that add no value. do_splice_to adds useful checks,
> > so if properly named and documented, I'm absolutely in favour.
>
> Fair enough. Rename to vfs_splice_read() okay with you?
Yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists