lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 19:49:26 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 09/11] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: add LEDs
 definition example

On 08/03/2023 14:57, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:58:33AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/03/2023 18:00, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Add LEDs definition example for qca8k Switch Family to describe how they
>>> should be defined for a correct usage.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
>>
>> Where is the changelog? This was v8 already! What happened with all
>> review, changes?
> 
> Did you read patch 0?
> 
> We have decided to start again, starting small and working up. This
> patchset just adds plain, boring LEDs. No acceleration, on hardware
> offload. Just on/off, and fixed blink.

Sure, but the patch is carried over. So what happened with all its
feedback? Was there or was not? How can we know?

> 
> What do you think makes the patchset is not bisectable? We are happy
> to address such issues, but i did not notice anything.

I didn't write anything like that here...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ