[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHApi-=C3ym23bBQ2h8BOyOfUtYXs9eZNG0Z8G2zfPeaEQWeRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 19:49:29 +0100
From: Kal Cutter Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xsk: Add missing overflow check in xdp_umem_reg
> The code is fine to me.
> Please resubmit with the fixed subject and expanded commit message.
> I'd also prefer that you sent v3 as a separate mail, *not* as a reply to
> this thread.
Done. I used "bpf" in the subject as you suggested, however I am a bit
confused by this. Should changes under net/xdp generally use "bpf" in
the subject?
Thanks,
Kal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists