linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b72d54ac-5152-bc6c-55a9-dd59d32614d6@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:17:58 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
        kishon@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
        bvanassche@....org, keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        gpiccoli@...lia.com
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes



On 6.03.2023 18:08, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
> the sm6125 platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
> ---
[...]

> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@...7000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-qmp-ufs-phy";
> +			reg = <0x04807000 0xdb8>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
Please wrap it into

clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
	 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
clock-names = "ref",
	      "ref_aux";


and resolve the binding/offset situation. Otherwise, LGTM!

Konrad
> +
> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> +
> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +
> +			#phy-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
>  		gpi_dma0: dma-controller@...0000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-gpi-dma", "qcom,sdm845-gpi-dma";
>  			reg = <0x04a00000 0x60000>;