[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230308011554.GA18319@T480>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 09:15:55 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpuidle: psci: Iterate backwards over list in
psci_pd_remove()
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:06:31PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 8:41 AM Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > In case that psci_pd_init_topology() fails for some reason,
> > psci_pd_remove() will be responsible for deleting provider and removing
> > genpd from psci_pd_providers list. There will be a failure when removing
> > the cluster PD, because the cpu (child) PDs haven't been removed.
> >
> > [ 0.050232] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0
> > [ 0.050278] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1
> > [ 0.050329] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2
> > [ 0.050370] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3
> > [ 0.050422] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0
> > [ 0.050475] PM: genpd_remove: unable to remove cpu-cluster0
> > [ 0.051412] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3
> > [ 0.051449] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2
> > [ 0.051499] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1
> > [ 0.051546] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0
> >
> > Fix the problem by iterating the provider list reversely, so that parent
> > PD gets removed after child's PDs like below.
> >
> > [ 0.029052] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0
> > [ 0.029076] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1
> > [ 0.029103] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2
> > [ 0.029124] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3
> > [ 0.029151] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0
> > [ 0.029647] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0
> > [ 0.029666] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1
> > [ 0.029690] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2
> > [ 0.029714] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3
> > [ 0.029738] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu-cluster0
> >
> > Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd")
>
> So I guess there should be Cc: stable for 5.10 and later?
Yes. I was thinking that stable team will pick it up due to the Fixes
tag, but yes, explicitly copying stable would be the best.
>
> > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > This is a resend of the patch [1]. Could you help pick it up or let me
> > know if there is anything need to be improved, thanks!
>
> Is this regarded as 6.3-rc material, or can it wait for 6.4?
As it's regarded as a fix, it would nice to apply it for 6.3-rc.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists